CWR APAC Coastal Threat Index for 20 cities

Aichi/ Nagoya, Auckland, Bangkok, Guangzhou, Ho Chi Minh, Hong Kong, Jakarta, Macao, Manila, Osaka, Seoul, Shanghai, Shenzhen, Singapore, Suzhou, Sydney, Taipei, Tianjin, Tokyo & Yangon – Asia Pacific Region

Project leader : China Water Risk (CWR)

Dates : 2020

Classification

Risks

Solutions

Actors

Costs

N/A

Summary

Climate change will drastically redraw coastlines threatening capital cities, economic growth and livelihoods. The 20 cities of the Asia Pacific Region (APAC) included in the CWR APACCT 20 Index are home to 207 million people and account for US$5.7trillion GDP or over a fifth of the GDP of the countries/territories. All these are at risk – exposed to increasing coastal threats of SLR as well as storm surges for those in the path of typhoons/tropical cyclones/hurricanes. Although chronic risks from sea level rise are starting to be recognized, there is still no consensus path forward regarding their assessment or valuation.

The CWR APACCT 20 Index was developed to help close the knowledge gap to fast-track action on decarbonisation and adaptation to protect vulnerable areas. It benchmarks 20 APAC capitals and key cities for chronic coastal threats and provides a risk snapshot. The Index assesses stacked locked-in SLR risks for 1.5˚C, 2˚C, 3˚C and 4˚C for each indicator (i.e. land area, population, key infrastructure) while including subsidence, storm surge and government adaptation action. Thus, the purpose of this indicator is to help gauge the absolute and relative coastal threats facing these 20 APAC cities by benchmarking underlying long-term physical threats from locked-in SLR and storm surge exposure as well as assessing the impact of adaptation actions taken by various governments as these can alleviate the risks faced by cities to a certain extent. In turn, using this finance-driven and practical index can help re-calibrate tail risks, re-think long term capital allocation decisions, and engage companies and governments to fast-track action.

Actions

The CWR APACCT 20 Index was developed to help close the knowledge gap to fast-track action on decarbonisation and adaptation to protect vulnerable areas. It benchmarks 20 APAC capitals and key cities for chronic coastal threats and provides a risk snapshot. The Index assesses stacked locked-in SLR risks for 1.5˚C, 2˚C, 3˚C and 4˚C for each indicator (i.e. land area, population, key infrastructure) while including subsidence, storm surge and government adaptation action. Thus, the purpose of this indicator is to help gauge the absolute and relative coastal threats facing these 20 APAC cities by benchmarking underlying long-term physical threats from locked-in SLR and storm surge exposure as well as assessing the impact of adaptation actions taken by various governments as these can alleviate the risks faced by cities to a certain extent. In turn, using this finance-driven and practical index can help re-calibrate tail risks, re-think long term capital allocation decisions, and engage companies and governments to fast-track action.

Conclusions from the CWR APACCT 20 Index: Adaptation planning is imperative, but the index rankings reveal that not all governments are taking action to protect their cities despite high exposure to coastal threats. Tapei and Macao are at the bottom of the 1.5°C and 4°C CWR APACCT 20 Indexes. Despite high vulnerability, other cities with lacklustre adaptations are Hong Kong and Tokyo. At the other end of the spectrum, Singapore leads the ranking in both 1.5°C and 4°C CWR APACCT 20 Indexes with over SGD100bn of expenditure on adaptation measures such as raising critical infrastructure by 5 meters. While Shanghai, Shenzhen and Guangzhou, are highly vulnerable, their adaptation efforts, including reinforcing and building sea walls, make up for their high rankings. As a result of Jakarta’s ambitious plans of moving its administrative capital plus building sea walls, artificial islands and polders, the city is ranked n°5 in the Indexes.

The CWR APACCT 20 Index is a finance-driven and practical index that can be used to re-calibrate tail risks, re-think long term capital allocation decisions, and engage companies and governments to fast-track action.

The CWR APACCT 20 Index is part of a 5-part report “CWR Coastal Capital Threat Series”. The reports include an overview of the latest science-based research on sea level rise and storm surge and their tail risk implications for finance; details on the development of the CWR APACCT 20 Index; factsheets with maps and data for all 20 APAC cities; highlights the implications for sovereign credit ratings; and provides a step-by-step guide on how to assess and value the risks as well as a list of recommended must-do’s and next steps for: governments; central banks/financial regulators; banks; and asset owners/managers.

The report “Waterproofing APAC To Avoid Atlantis – Executive Summary & Next Steps” is the executive summary of the entire series of reports. This step-by-step guide can be used by governments, finance and the private sector to ensure resilience in the face of rising seas. It provides an overview of the three major steps necessary to ensure resilience in the face of our changing risk landscape:

  • Step 1: Need-to-know new risk landscape – an executive summary of the latest climate science on coastal threats and analyses of physical impacts at various temperature scenarios plus government and central bank adaptation actions/inactions;
  • Step 2: Threat exposure assessment – a guide to using the CWR APACCT 20 Index to assess relative and absolute risks across APAC, how to build various base and worst-case coastal threat scenarios as well as changing regulatory landscapes driven by central banks globally plus other available tools; and
  • Step 3: Take action to switch from hard to soft landing – a list of recommended must-do’s as well as next steps for: 1) governments; 2) central banks & financial regulators; 3) banks and 4) asset owners & managers.

Outcomes

The Index has helped kickstart the conversation on chronic coastal threats and CWR hopes it provides impetus to push all stakeholders to stress test for the worst-case scenario and have flexible, nimble adaptation plans in place to ensure long term resilience. Since publishing the index and reports, some fund managers have started using it to engage with portfolio companies, some banks are using the information to set stress test levels, credit rating agencies are looking into how best to add government adaptation action into sovereign ratings and central banks plus financial regulators are exploring the findings and how best to use them for their domestic markets. The financial sector and companies have also started using the information to engage with local and federal government agencies to ensure no regret adaptation planning as government action is paramount.

Over 100 finance professionals from chairs/directors of bank boards to research analysts as well as financial industry associations, asset owners and financial regulators have provided feedback on the development of the index.

Since its launch in 2011, CWR has worked from its Hong Kong base to engage with global business and investment communities in understanding and managing basins, coastal and sectoral water risks in China and across Asia. Today, CWR leads the water climate risk conversation with proprietary research, including co-publishing policy briefs with government-related bodies in China and beyond. CWR’s experience, reputation and vast network in the financial sector allowed it to reach and engage a large audience on the importance and financial materiality of coastal threats. It has also encouraged actions by multiple parties to improve risk understanding and start planning on how to protect themselves while benefiting from the changes baked in.

Decarbonization must be stepped up if we are to avoid the worst-case. Yet, the conversation around climate change continues to focus on mitigation, despite being highly unlikely that all carbon pledges will be met, and significant impacts are already felt with record-breaking floods, droughts and heatwaves.

In addition, coastal threats are by no means the only water risk to consider. A holistic analysis is necessary to understand and address various critical points, whether being water stress, flood risk, pollution or coastal hazards; more so in Asia, as large populations and economies are clustered in river basins and along the coast. Asia needs to manage these risks alongside economic development – to do this all risks must be understood and assessed together to ensure the implementation of appropriate action plans.

Partners

Financial partners: ADM Capital Foundation (ADMCF), RS Group and Rockefellers Brothers Fund (RBF)

Resources